The Documentary Legend reflecting on His War of Independence Project: ‘We Won’t Work on a More Important Film’
Ken Burns has evolved into more than a filmmaker; he represents an institution, a one-man industrial complex. When he has documentary series heading for the PBS network, everyone seeks an interview.
The filmmaker completed “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he remarks, approaching the conclusion of nine-month promotional tour that included four dozen cities, numerous film showings and hundreds of interviews. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”
Fortunately the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, equally articulate in interviews as he is prolific during post-production. The 72-year-old has traveled from prestigious venues to popular podcasts to talk about his latest monumental work: his Revolutionary War documentary, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that occupied a substantial portion of his recent years and premiered recently on public television.
Defiantly Traditional Approach
Comparable to methodical preparation in an age of fast food, The American Revolution intentionally classic, more redolent of historical documentary classics rather than contemporary online content new media formats.
For the documentarian, who has built a career documenting American historical narratives spanning various American subjects, its origin story is not just another subject but foundational. “I recently told collaborator Sarah Botstein recently, and she concurred: we won’t work on a more important film Burns reflects during a telephone interview.
Massive Research Effort
The filmmaking team along with writer Geoffrey Ward utilized thousands of books and primary source materials. Dozens of historians, covering various ideological backgrounds, contributed scholarly insights in conjunction with distinguished researchers covering various specialties like African American history, Native American history plus colonial history.
Signature Documentary Style
The documentary’s methodology will feel familiar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. The unique approach featured gradual camera movements through archival photographs, extensive employment of contemporary scores and actors reading diaries, letters and speeches.
This period represented Burns established his reputation; a generation later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he can attract numerous talented actors. Participating with Burns during a recent appearance, the Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda observed: “When Ken Burns calls, you say ‘Yes.’”
Extraordinary Talent
The decade-long production schedule provided advantages regarding scheduling. Recordings took place in studios, at historical sites through digital platforms, a tool embraced throughout the health crisis. The director describes the experience with performer Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours in Atlanta to record his lines as George Washington then continuing to subsequent commitments.
The cast includes Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, respected performing veterans, emerging and established stars, Tom Hanks, Ethan Hawke, Maya Hawke, celebrated film and stage performers, international acting community, versatile character actors, small and big screen veterans, plus additional notable names.
The filmmaker continues: “Honestly, this could represent the finest ensemble recruited for any project. Their work is exceptional. Selection wasn’t based on fame. It irritated me when questioned, about the prominent cast. I go, ‘These are actors.’ They are among the world’s best performers and they can bring this stuff alive.”
Historical Complexity
Still, the lack of surviving participants, visual documentation compelled the production to depend substantially on the written word, integrating personal accounts of nearly 200 individual historic figures. This allowed them to show spectators not only to the “bold-faced names” of the founders plus numerous additional who are seminal to the story”, many of whom remain visually unknown.
Burns additionally pursued his particular enthusiasm for maps and spatial representation. “I love maps,” he comments, “featuring increased geographical representation in this film than in all the other films I’ve done combined.”
Worldwide Consequences
The production crew recorded across multiple important places across North America plus English locations to capture the landscape’s character and collaborated substantially with living history participants. These components unite to depict events more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing than the one taught in schools.
The film maintains, was no mere parochial quarrel concerning territory, taxes and political voice. Rather, the series depicts a brutal conflict that ultimately drew in more than two dozen nations and unexpectedly manifested described as “the noble aspirations of humankind”.
Civil War Reality
Initial complaints and protests aimed at the crown by American colonists in 13 fractious colonies soon descended into a vicious internal war, setting brother against brother and neighbour against neighbour. During the second installment, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The main misapprehension concerning independence struggle involves believing it represented a consolidating event for colonists. This omits the fact that Americans fought each other.”
Nuanced Understanding
According to his perspective, the revolution is a story that “typically suffers from excessive romance and idealization and is incredibly superficial and doesn’t have the respect actual events, and all the participants and the extensive brutality.
It was, he contends, a movement that announced the revolutionary principle of the unalienable rights of people; a vicious internal conflict, pitting Patriots against Loyalists; plus an international conflict, another installment in a sequence of struggles among European powers for dominance in the New World.
Contingent Historical Events
Burns additionally aimed {to rediscover the